RE: evolution as changed in the last 100 years
October 11, 2015 at 4:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 4:35 am by Alex K.)
(October 10, 2015 at 7:29 pm)justin65 Wrote: I think the evolution of man and woman as actually changed in the last 100 years and in actual fact every 20 years or even every year if you look close enough.. Look at people on films from the 1920s and 30s dont you see these human beings look different to our modern gilrs and boys. Dont give me that excuse, oh they only look different because of the fashion they wear is different from todays fashion. I think thats a rubbish excuse. Look at 1930s women do they look anything like modern girls. Well of course not. In fact in that time there was hardly a stunning looking girl but today they are mostly all stunning. Why is that. Noone as commented on the evolution of the human being as changed in the last 100 years. Can you imagine a guy of the 1920s wearing jeans and saying hey dude. It would not suit him and he would not look the part. Simarily different eras like the sixties bands. Why did they all come about that particular period. Those type of bands should be around all the time since the that time. It seems strange to me. Its like its all meant to be a certain time and place, but thats not how chance works . Chance is all the time. Are you saying sixties type bands exist today but they dont play because they would not suit our era. i think thats rubbish talk. That would mean there is another beatles band wanting to play today but they are in hiding instead.
This is easily explained scientifically. The people born before the modern Darwinian synthesis in 1932 didn't have genes yet, and it shows...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
