![[Image: 4rPGp.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2F4rPGp.jpg)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 10, 2025, 3:10 pm
Thread Rating:
evolution as changed in the last 100 years
|
RE: evolution as changed in the last 100 years
October 11, 2015 at 2:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 2:41 am by robvalue.)
This is still closer to the truth than people who think evolution says animals evolve during their own lifetime.
Other things "evolve" as well, such as fashion trends. Let's ask Histor: http://youtu.be/PODhohxYRfA Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum
Hey Justin. You think wrong matey.
You do know that cheetahs are all genetically identical still after 10,000 years don't you.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. RE: evolution as changed in the last 100 years
October 11, 2015 at 4:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 4:35 am by Alex K.)
(October 10, 2015 at 7:29 pm)justin65 Wrote: I think the evolution of man and woman as actually changed in the last 100 years and in actual fact every 20 years or even every year if you look close enough.. Look at people on films from the 1920s and 30s dont you see these human beings look different to our modern gilrs and boys. Dont give me that excuse, oh they only look different because of the fashion they wear is different from todays fashion. I think thats a rubbish excuse. Look at 1930s women do they look anything like modern girls. Well of course not. In fact in that time there was hardly a stunning looking girl but today they are mostly all stunning. Why is that. Noone as commented on the evolution of the human being as changed in the last 100 years. Can you imagine a guy of the 1920s wearing jeans and saying hey dude. It would not suit him and he would not look the part. Simarily different eras like the sixties bands. Why did they all come about that particular period. Those type of bands should be around all the time since the that time. It seems strange to me. Its like its all meant to be a certain time and place, but thats not how chance works . Chance is all the time. Are you saying sixties type bands exist today but they dont play because they would not suit our era. i think thats rubbish talk. That would mean there is another beatles band wanting to play today but they are in hiding instead. This is easily explained scientifically. The people born before the modern Darwinian synthesis in 1932 didn't have genes yet, and it shows...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008260981/
Pick a diva. When was she born?
This is the same shit and run poster (same name, anyroad) who came here whinging that chemicals didn't have any motive or expectation of reward to create life. Just saying.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(October 11, 2015 at 5:15 am)pocaracas Wrote: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls008260981/ The comments section there points out quite a few that list missed, too.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love. (October 10, 2015 at 7:29 pm)justin65 Wrote: I think the evolution of man and woman as actually changed in the last 100 years and in actual fact every 20 years or even every year if you look close enough.. Look at people on films from the 1920s and 30s dont you see these human beings look different to our modern gilrs and boys. Dont give me that excuse, oh they only look different because of the fashion they wear is different from todays fashion. I think thats a rubbish excuse. Look at 1930s women do they look anything like modern girls. Well of course not. In fact in that time there was hardly a stunning looking girl but today they are mostly all stunning. Why is that. Noone as commented on the evolution of the human being as changed in the last 100 years. Can you imagine a guy of the 1920s wearing jeans and saying hey dude. It would not suit him and he would not look the part. Simarily different eras like the sixties bands. Why did they all come about that particular period. Those type of bands should be around all the time since the that time. It seems strange to me. Its like its all meant to be a certain time and place, but thats not how chance works . Chance is all the time. Are you saying sixties type bands exist today but they dont play because they would not suit our era. i think thats rubbish talk. That would mean there is another beatles band wanting to play today but they are in hiding instead. ![]()
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)