(October 12, 2015 at 9:45 am)ChadWooters Wrote: And from my perspective ruling out transcendent causes in favor of naturalism while maintaining a commitment to intentionality requires massive logical inconsistencies.
Oh, "inconsistencies" - you mean like wearing seat-belts, while believing in an invisible, omnipresent and omnipotent nanny in the sky, as well as an infinitely better life after death? Those kinds of "inconsistencies"?
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
