(December 5, 2010 at 10:56 pm)Arcanus Wrote:Biut the courts are granting expanded powers to the Feds through the Commerce Clause. A judge in Va. affirmed the health care mandate due to his belief that a person will need health care at some point in his or her life. Talk about stretching the Commerce Clause.(December 1, 2010 at 2:27 pm)Jaysyn Wrote: I agree with you on this point, but time after time the interstate Commerce clause makes states rights its bitch. What do you propose to do about this federal loophole?
The clause does not grant Congress exclusive power to regulate all commerce; it grants Congress power to regulate interstate commerce, such that states regulatory powers do not extend to interstate commerce (thus preventing states from erecting protectionist regulations; e.g., Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, wherein New York had tried using alleged health concerns as a pretext for keeping out products from other states in order to protect their own industries).
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 3, 2025, 1:49 pm
Thread Rating:
There Will be Blood
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
There Will be Blood - by lilyannerose - November 22, 2010 at 7:15 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by DeistPaladin - November 22, 2010 at 10:47 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Minimalist - November 22, 2010 at 11:17 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - November 23, 2010 at 2:25 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ashendant - November 23, 2010 at 7:45 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by DeistPaladin - November 23, 2010 at 8:46 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by lilyannerose - November 23, 2010 at 10:39 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - November 25, 2010 at 2:50 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by DeistPaladin - November 25, 2010 at 9:25 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by lilyannerose - November 26, 2010 at 1:13 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Jaysyn - December 1, 2010 at 2:27 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - December 5, 2010 at 10:56 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Mishka - December 5, 2010 at 11:47 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - December 6, 2010 at 1:09 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Mishka - December 6, 2010 at 2:09 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ashendant - December 6, 2010 at 10:48 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - December 6, 2010 at 11:25 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Minimalist - November 25, 2010 at 2:58 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by downbeatplumb - November 26, 2010 at 3:55 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by padraic - November 26, 2010 at 4:03 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by DeistPaladin - November 27, 2010 at 7:45 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by Ryft - November 28, 2010 at 6:00 pm
RE: There Will be Blood - by DeistPaladin - November 29, 2010 at 10:00 am
RE: There Will be Blood - by Mishka - December 6, 2010 at 1:34 pm
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Trump has blood on his hands | WinterHold | 60 | 6848 |
December 13, 2018 at 2:59 am Last Post: Belacqua |
|
"Black people blood" isn't accepted in Israel. | I and I | 19 | 6872 |
December 12, 2013 at 6:20 pm Last Post: LostLocke |
|
There is Stupid and then there is | Minimalist | 60 | 22035 |
March 15, 2010 at 9:53 am Last Post: Thor |
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)