(October 16, 2015 at 9:19 am)ChadWooters Wrote: ................(crickets)
Not only is there no empirically verifiable evidence for the multiverse, there could not ever be. By definition, the constants and physical laws that make our universe possible would not apply in another. In short, our version of physics would have no applicability to the 'natural' laws of an alternate universe. The multiverse is an unfalsifiable faith-based theory.
And just when the hell did you suddenly start caring about empirical, verifiable evidence? You'll prattle on and on about metaphysical universals and you have the balls to dismiss the multiverse based on a perceived lack of verifiable evidence? Suddenly you're a logical positivist when it comes to the multiverse?
I know it's hard to maintain consistency when you're trying to force the evidence to fit a pet conclusion, but even you should be able to recognize and hang your head in shame for such blatant intellectual dishonesty.