Why does intelligent design "not need an explanation"? It seems to me that it does.
Why were things designed?
How were they designed?
Why does all the evidence not support intelligent design, and there is SOOOO much evidence?
why for most of the history of life was there very little variation if there was intelligent design?
or his he like the god of evolution on the disc world.
Why were things designed?
How were they designed?
Why does all the evidence not support intelligent design, and there is SOOOO much evidence?
why for most of the history of life was there very little variation if there was intelligent design?
or his he like the god of evolution on the disc world.
Quote:Turning his back completely on the human race and moving to Mono Island, he then threw his energies into re-designing living creatures and seeking to improve on them. This is hampered as he can only do things one at a time: until he has a frank chat with Mrs Whitlow, he is ignorant in the fine details of how to get his creations to reproduce themselves. Many of his early creations proved non-viable, due to his misguided attempt to put wheels on everything; of the ones that made it, the hermit elephant can be considered typical of his "improvements".
By then, most of the wizards have taken advantage of Argo Nauticae Uniquo to leave the island. Ponder Stibbons stays - for just long enough to grasp the awful truth of how far this God has turned his back on the human race.
The future has six legs and is cockroach-shaped. Insects are the pinnacle of life. Larger animals are there mainly to provide dung, or hosts for parasites.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
