(December 7, 2010 at 6:27 pm)padraic Wrote: @Ashendant
No,I don't think so .My perception of Assange is that he is a toxic narcissist and a criminal.Who the fuck put him in charge?
I do not subscribe to the notion of the' public's right to know ANYTHING. (rejecting the notion of innate rights of any kind)
I have only deep suspicion of and contempt for self righteous vigilantes and self described altruists.
Assange has broken no laws, at least relating to WikiLeaks. And I shudder to think of the day, which seems closer than farther, where men are harassed, jailed or even executed because they're perceived as "toxic".
All defined rights have their limits, some more than others. The right for Americans to know where their goddamn taxes are being spend is a fair one to note. Certainly, that right has certain limitations, but who in their right mind would argue for one way or another?
Your suspicions, in light of this and noting that you decided to attack the character, not the concepts, seem to me to most ridiculous.
Assange is now the current litmus test for totalitarianism - as he has committed no crime (except the same "crime" that newspapers have been doing since forever - one example is the Pentagon Papers) with regards to WikiLeaks, we shall see if merely pissing off the brave leader of the "Free World" with their much vaunted democracy allows for an excuse to circumvent it's "ideals".
(December 7, 2010 at 11:54 pm)Mishka Wrote: Don't coddle the knucklehead.
Coddle?
Ah, so because he's an inconvenience to your perception of things, then we must treat him roughly even though he has broken no law?
I see.
...
I, for one, jeer our new overlords.
Oh yeah, Mishka - have you ever paused to think about this phrase:
"You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind"
If any part of WikiLeaks is going down, even one of their close members, then it will get nasty. And they aren't bluffing.
Don't coddle the knucklehead... right...