What are the evidence for no god?

[TheRocketSurgeon]

Thank you for your compliment.  I don't dismiss science completely.  That would be out of complete ignorance.  Yes science and math have advanced to the way of life that we know it today.  I really do not have a problem with the big bang theory or evolution.  The only thing that I really disagree with on the evolution is that we all started with  a single celled organism that developed into everything we see today and that monkeys and humans come from a common ancestor.  There are some things that are too complex to have a start like that.  However, I do think that creatures, plants, and humans do adapt over time and the survival of the fittest. If you take an albino deer in the wild to live like all of the other deer, then that albino according to the survival of the fittest idea is not going to survive as long as the other deer with the normal colors because the albino is going to be spotted first by the predator in fall, spring, and summer in the places where the climate in the winter allows for snow fall.  Most people have 4 wisdom teeth.  I only had 3 wisdom teeth which means nature must have decided that I only needed 3 for whatever reason. Now if my children have no wisdom teeth than nature decided to rid of wisdom teeth lets say in my line. Natural selection is when there is no longer a need for a certain creature in the earth so it gets rid of that particular species.  I know God can't be proven nor can He be proven to not exist.  One question I do have is why can't God and science go hand in hand?  The creation story in the the Bible only says what He created and when He created it as far as day 1 or 2, etc goes. It never said how long the days were nor does it say how He did it.  Therefore He very well could have created it by what we know as the Big Bang theory or model.  

There is some science in the Bible such as bathing.  Circumcision for a male child is also in there.  I think the Jewish requirement was that the male child had to be 7 days old first.  It was just a custom back than, but today's science have let us know why we are to circumcise the male child, but it is the parents' decision to circumcise or not.  We know by knowledge that it is painful for them later and that the male is more susceptible to germs and infections if not done.

Leprosy which was common in the centuries noted as BC and early AD.  People knew that leprosy was contagious so the lepers had to be quarantined so the infection was not spread.  Now we know that this was a result of people not bathing regularly.  

The Bible is not a scientific book nor was it meant to be, but there are some scientific evidence today as to why they did some things in the early stages of time.

I don't have a problem using the word theory.  Some theories in science have been dismissed while others have been proven and still others need a whole lot more work such as the idea of the macro-evolution.  

It may not be too late to go back to believing.  I have even heard the question asked, "Can you believe in evolution and the God at the same time? " It is up to the individual to decide in my opinion which everyone as one.  

It's no longer a matter of believing in evolution or rejecting faith; it was simply when I caught a church leader making up lies (or repeating them from others) about what science actually says, on the subject of biology, that I realized they may have lied to me about other things, and upon investigation I found a great deal wrong with my own faith-traditions, which I had never truly scrutinized the way we do other claims we stumble upon. Once I did, the traditions of Christianity were damaged beyond repair. It is possible I could one day find a god-concept worthy of belief, but it will most assuredly not be Christianity, or anything similar.

What you call "macro-evolution" is well-proved. The human-ape ancestry question is most heavily proved of all, following the discoveries in 1999 (and afterward, based on that database) Human Genome Project, which is why I pointed you to Dr. Collins' work. The process of adaptation of a population by natural selection to fit its environment is one of the ways in which evolution happens, but it's not all there is. Even your introduction to biology course should have told you that. 

There is zero serious debate over the question of whether we share a common ancestor with the other Great Apes, like chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas. It's in our DNA, specifically in "marker" regions and "scars" on our DNA which only are found in the same place in family lineages that share a common ancestor (say, you and your brother; or you, your brother, and your cousin), and the same markers on our inactive (non-environment-influenced) DNA tell us that we are related to those species by way of a great-great-grandparent roughly 7 million years ago. That's not counting overall similarity of DNA, or similarity of appearance, or any other factor... just the inheritable marker-regions.

And the circumcision thing is on day 8.