Robvalue is completely right. The onus is till on the creationist to give evidence to support creationism.
If evolution was proved wrong, that wouldn't make creationism right at all.
Attacking evolution is a red herring if you're trying to defend creationism. And in fact it's mostly what creationists do - attack evolution. They tend to never even attempt to defend their position at all, all they do is say "Well the Bible says the world was created" which isn't a defense.
If evolution was proved wrong, that wouldn't make creationism right at all.
Attacking evolution is a red herring if you're trying to defend creationism. And in fact it's mostly what creationists do - attack evolution. They tend to never even attempt to defend their position at all, all they do is say "Well the Bible says the world was created" which isn't a defense.
