(October 19, 2015 at 12:54 pm)Blondie Wrote: I am not sure how to put this to get my idea across so please do not take any offense to it. Evolution has been said to have scientific evidence behind it. Now some creationists have also used science to show the earth much younger than what is originally thought. I can't find it right off the bat. But anyway, since science is science, both Creationists and Evolutionists use science to back their claims, who is right?
Like someone else said on this site that science has nothing to do with atheism, but it does help.
Sorry to break this to you, but there is literally zero science supporting a young Earth.
You've been lied to, or have chosen to remain ignorant.
Dr. Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, and an Evangelical Christian, has stated that he DNA evidence alone is enough to prove common ancestry between humans and our ape like ancestors.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.