(October 28, 2015 at 3:18 pm)sinnerdaniel94 Wrote:(October 28, 2015 at 3:11 pm)Beccs Wrote: Again, biblical claims.
I've asked for non biblical references.
At the time, Jerusalem was under Roman control. Why have none of the records from the time confirmed the reports? The dead getting up and walking around the city was probably somewhat news worthy, huh?
And again, you're ignoring the proof that Thor isn't real.
why do you just deny the historical books in the bible flat out?
and Jesus was only seen of the people mentioned in the bible so how can anyone else report on it?
I dismiss the supernatural claims. There are some interesting historical insights into the times, and the mind sets of the people (something that has, sadly, continued into modern times among some people). But there is the fact that many of the claims of the bible are contradictory, many of the books have been shown to have multiple authors, and much archaeological evidence contradicts the claims.
You ignore all my points again. That is a typical apologist tactic: Ignore uncomfortable facts and more on, hoping we won't notice.
We do.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"