RE: I rejoice to be an atheist.
March 4, 2009 at 8:22 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2009 at 8:25 pm by fr0d0.)
(March 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote:Well it's unfair as I can't argue that one with you as an admin. It wasn't a petty insult at all. It was a joke, a lighthearted comment. You seem to be taking unwarrented offence at my posts(March 4, 2009 at 7:21 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Shut itThis is an open forum, and petty insults like that don't go unnoticed (especially if you try to hide them immaturely by putting a smiley next to it).

(March 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote:If they were followers of Jesus, absolutely. Why not?Quote:The only definition is follower of christ.So by that definition anyone could be a Christian as long as they followed the teachings of Jesus, so atheists for Jesus could rightly be called Christians.
(March 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote:Those stats you linkedQuote:Most british people think that being born in the UK makes them christian.Proof?
(March 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote:I know it very well, and my comments stand. What do you have a problem with?Quote:The scotsman is a scotsman is a scotsman. Tho' the analogy fits non christians who call themselves that quite well.You don't really get the no true scotsman fallacy do you? Perhaps you should read up on it.
(March 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm)Tiberius Wrote: This coming from the guy who in the same fricken' post said "The only definition is follower of christ.". You refute your own arguments! Since when did following Christ require you to believe in God???You are obviously unfamiliar with the concept of following Christ. Nothing in what I've said is contradictory.