RE: The Extremis of Rationality
November 8, 2015 at 3:59 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2015 at 4:01 pm by robvalue.)
Absurdity and paradoxes tend to arise from incomplete understandings, and applying simple rules and principles to unknown territory. I feel confident our understanding of time is woefully incomplete, and is already indicated to not be a simple parameter. So all we can do is model how things seem to be; that's all science can ever do.
When philosophy tries to go beyond the limits of science, it's always going to end up strangling itself. So I wouldn't call this kind of extrapolation rational, because it goes beyond what evidence can support. It just shows we are unequipped, perhaps permanently, to totally understand what is going on.
When philosophy tries to go beyond the limits of science, it's always going to end up strangling itself. So I wouldn't call this kind of extrapolation rational, because it goes beyond what evidence can support. It just shows we are unequipped, perhaps permanently, to totally understand what is going on.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum