Witness Evidence

[Thumpalumpacus]

I think the idea that you can have a cut-and-dried standard is laughably naive, and indicative of your lack of real thinking on this matter. Equivocating different events of vastly different likelihood so that you can arrive at one standard, which you will then use to push your silly beliefs, is disingenuous.

You can protest all you want, but your stubborn refusal to engage your own thinking when confronted with contrary information marks you as either incredibly dumb, or dishonest. And quite frankly, you don't strike me as dumb. I see no need to feed your transparent attempt to draw a false equivalence between reality and your particular fairy tale.

You've been shown why eyewitness testimony is not reliable. You've also been shown why the scientific endeavor is not eyewitness testimony. You refuse to take that information aboard.

Your ignorance is of your own making.