Evidence vs proof?

[drfuzzy]

Proof is when you have enough scientific evidence to reach a conclusion

Not exactly.  'Proved' has a someone different meaning in science that it does in philosophy.  I think it was Asimov (I may be mistaken and can't be arsed to look it up) who said, ' "Proved" in the sciences can only mean that a proposition is established to such a high degree of confidence that to withhold provisional assent would be perverse.'  Properly speaking, all scientific conclusions are provisional, never 'proved'.

Boru

Oh!  Thanks Boru.  Yes, that's a bit different.  Not being a scientist, I forget that scientists treat all "proof" as proof until better proof comes along.  
I honor that.  It's a constant quest for knowledge.