(December 17, 2015 at 6:29 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(December 17, 2015 at 6:18 pm)Losty Wrote: I didn't read the whole thing but I've seen two posts by two people saying they're not accusing you of saying that. So I still think it looks like both sides arguing for no reason.
Well just so you don't think I'm going nuts, here is where they both make accusations:
(December 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: No, CL, I don't think you downplayed rape, I just thought you should know clearly that arousal is not consent, and how one should go about it if they ever decide to do anything kinky.
(December 17, 2015 at 9:19 am)Brian37 Wrote: Some morons think rape is strictly about a man getting a boner and enjoying the vaginal penetration.The "moron" he is referring to is me, btw.
So, as you can see, I'm being accused of thinking arousal = consent, and of thinking rape is only a vaginal penetration of male on female.
No you said you didn't now that men could get aroused did you not? And even after you admitted you didn't know that you continue to accuse us of putting words in your mouth. I said SOME, is your name "some"?
This is not the first thread a believer has started asking us if we do horrible violent things to others. You didn't start it did you? But you did admit to a deficit in your knowledge. "Moron" was referring to the OP, those who cling to bad logic and bad data even after they are corrected. So you admitted your flaw and your deficit so no, you are not the "some" I was referring to.
