(December 24, 2015 at 3:22 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 2:20 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Yes, you continue to make that assertion, yet, you have been asked many times to open a thread and present your evidence. Aren't you obligated under Peter 3:15 to do that? Or am I misunderstanding Christianity?
If you have done that already and I missed it, please point me to it.
Other than that, all I can see is you making one unsupported assertion after another.
The burden of proof is on the atheist who claims to have assessed the evidence and have good reasons to reject putative evidence, to provide their reasons.
Otherwise they are charlatans.
Completely laughable.
You are the one making an existential claim. the Burden is all yours.
We both, I assume, accept the existence of the universe exists. You are the one that is adding an entity to explain the existence of said universe.
Again, you have he burden of proof.
What putative evidence are you referring to? Please present it and convince me.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
