(December 24, 2015 at 5:11 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 3:22 pm)Delicate Wrote: The burden of proof is on the atheist who claims to have assessed the evidence and have good reasons to reject putative evidence, to provide their reasons.
Otherwise they are charlatans.
Completely laughable.
You are the one making an existential claim. the Burden is all yours.
We both, I assume, accept the existence of the universe exists. You are the one that is adding an entity to explain the existence of said universe.
Again, you have he burden of proof.
What putative evidence are you referring to? Please present it and convince me.
We're not talking about the existence of God, dipshit.
Pay attention. We're talking about how to make sure someone who claims to see no evidence for the existence of God isn't just a blind incompetent.
Is atheism the result of blind incompetence in assessing evidence? If not, what is the putative evidence they claim to have examined and dismissed?
