(December 24, 2015 at 7:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 5:18 pm)Delicate Wrote: We're not talking about the existence of God, dipshit.
Pay attention. We're talking about how to make sure someone who claims to see no evidence for the existence of God isn't just a blind incompetent.
Is atheism the result of blind incompetence in assessing evidence? If not, what is the putative evidence they claim to have examined and dismissed?
Either way.
It is still up to you to provide your evidence, then we'll assess it to determine if it is: demonstrable, repeatable, falsifiable and stands up to reasoned argument, and is logically valid and sound.
I'm not about to guess what evidence you claim to have, then dismiss it as not being convincing without first examining it.
Please, open a thread, present your evidence so it can be assessed.
If it's up to me to provide evidence, and I haven't, then your atheism isn't based on analyzing and debunking any evidence, is it?
Your atheism can only be based on blind incompetence, as you admit.
