street epistemology

[drfuzzy]

Yes, you continue to make that assertion, yet, you have been asked many times to open a thread and present your evidence. Aren't  you obligated under Peter 3:15 to do that? Or am I misunderstanding Christianity?

If you have done that already and I missed it, please point me to it. 

Other than that, all I can see is you making one unsupported assertion after another.

The burden of proof is on the atheist who claims to have assessed the evidence and have good reasons to reject putative evidence, to provide their reasons.

Otherwise they are charlatans.

The burden of proof is upon the person making the claim.  By attacking our stance that we do not see enough evidence to cause us to believe in a deity, you are claiming the existence of said deity.   Therefore, the burden of proof requires that you provide the evidence that you claim to have, which (according to you) we either cannot see or have foolishly dismissed.  The only evidence that most atheists will accept is quantitative, verifiable, empirical scientific data.  If you have that data, then provide it.   If you cannot provide it, and keep posting deflections and strawmen and insults and non sequiturs . . . then we should all stop responding, because you have already proven that you are a lying troll.