RE: street epistemology
December 25, 2015 at 4:19 pm
(This post was last modified: December 25, 2015 at 4:23 pm by Simon Moon.)
(December 25, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 25, 2015 at 3:15 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: You not any where near as bright as you think you are.
I am an atheist based on the complete lack of a compelling case every theist has been able provide for the existence of their god, up until now.
My atheism is, and has always been, a provisional position, not a dogmatic one.
As long as theists fail to provide demonstrable, repeatable, falsifiable evidence, reasoned argument and valid and sound logic to support their claim that a god exists, I will continue to be an atheist.
So...
Are you going to continue to talk crap, or are you going to provide your evidence?
Have theists tried to provide you evidence in the past?
Of course, they present what they believe is evidence.
You haven't seen theists on this site presenting "evidence" on various threads?
But it always turns out the be: quotes from various ancient texts, philosophical arguments (ontological, teleological, Kalam, TAG, etc), personal experiences, and other flawed, fallacious and otherwise unconvincing "evidence".
So, we are once again at the point that you claim to have facts that a god exists, yet you have not presented them. You have been asked many times to open a thread and present your evidence. Are you ever going to do it, or continue to complain?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
