street epistemology

[drfuzzy]

I'm not Simon Moon, but I'll answer for myself what I find to be valid evidence for god(s).

Verifiable, repeatable & falsifiable evidence that can be verified by outside sources, repeated under controlled conditions and is able to be falsified.

The first 2 requirements - verifiable and repeatable - refers to simple conditions for phenomena or basic logic. The 3rd is the interesting one; falsifiable means that there should be an experiment/observation that would disprove the evidence, and when that is met, would be a condition under which your evidence could be dismissed or verified.

---

EDIT: Also, I've yet to find any theist, (or psychic, diviner, etc. for that matter) to produce any amount of the supernatural and that failed these 3 criteria.

Thanks. This is a genuinely substantive response

And now we get snarky sarcasm.  I have told you the same thing in these threads more than a dozen times, on my own, and other members have done the same.