(December 28, 2015 at 3:06 pm)TrueChristian Wrote: For president?
I know you people go on and on about the dangers of mixing church and state.
Well, if you had a Roman Catholic as president, not only would you have a religious president, but you would have one who is beholden to a foreign power, that of the Pope and the Vatican. There a lot of wonky religions out there, but few require their adherents to pledge alleigance to some man on a marble chair, an allegiance that should supersede allegiance to the red white and blue.
*Looks around dazed*
Did I just wander into 1960?
Um, let's see . . . JFK or Nixon . . . JFK or Nixon? Should I vote for the philandering playboy Catholic who doesn't allow his private faith to interfere with his secular duties or for the paranoid, racist guy of good Quaker stock who will stoop to anything to win and (WHO KNOWS?) just might engage in criminal behavior and attempt to subvert the constitution in the future. Fucking choices . . . .
I'll have to get back to you on that, TrueChristian. Why don't you help me sort out my priorities?