(December 31, 2015 at 3:33 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I've listened to the reasoning of Atheists of why they are Atheists, and all of them seem to be circular in reasoning. I heard no one say "I've come to believe that I have no vision of myself as being a soul because this and that, while properly basic vision of God or knowledge of God is a rational possibility, I believe it is untrue from sincere observation of myself, and I've looked at this and this arguments, and I've reasoned they are wrong for this and this reasons, I've also tried to come up with arguments myself and this is the best arguments I can come up with, but I think don't hold to scrutiny because" etc...
Also, I haven't seen anyone do what I did which is go through as much as unbiased debate with oneself...come up with arguments for and against, etc, and see which ones hold at the end, and how much you can modify your argument to counter argument.
People lost a magical feeling, gave up on it, and concluded all arguments don't stand for God, even when they refute them with the most irrelevant of remarks.
The problem is that your only connection to god/allah is a book written ages ago by people with a very limited knowledge of the world.
1.The "knowledge" shows what man thought they knew at the time
2."god" or "allah" was used when man didn't know anything (god of the gaps etc)
3.The "rules" and "morals" in the books were most likely derived from the culture and the leaders using it to control at the time.
That's my opinion at least.
