RE: Is motion like the following?
December 31, 2015 at 5:32 am
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2015 at 5:33 am by Mudhammam.)
(December 29, 2015 at 5:08 am)excitedpenguin Wrote: This is unreadable. Edit it.Sorry, I was a little stoned, and had just finished reading Thomas Aquinas' Contra Summa Gentiles, which is all I had been reading for the prior month, and that incredibly dull and boring work does something to petrify the mind in a not so good way. What I wanted to say was this: A moved object (A) requires a mover (B), otherwise it must be self-moved (AB). Furthermore, self-motion can only be random, for anything else (i.e. not random but moved at a particular instant to this or that end) will be determined by object B, the mover. This appears to me to be the only possibilities with respect to motion, granted it actually exists.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
