MK, if you are gonna talk with someone and are honest about learning, stick with it till the end. I see you starting discussions, then moving to new threads without addressing the arguments in your previous thread.
Also
1) If you truly understand something, you should be able to convey it to others, or at least attempt to do so.
2) The whole concept of "deep truths" belongs in the realms of philosophy, don't confuse it with science
3) In your explanation for souls, you go on to suggest that one needs to acknowledge there is a soul to see/feel soul. That line of thinking is wrong, because if you accept something before examining it's validity, you've already reached and accepted your conclusion without any chance of validating it. If you think there is a soul, first start by defining a soul, and show how and where it is a necessary component in the equation of life.
Also
1) If you truly understand something, you should be able to convey it to others, or at least attempt to do so.
2) The whole concept of "deep truths" belongs in the realms of philosophy, don't confuse it with science
3) In your explanation for souls, you go on to suggest that one needs to acknowledge there is a soul to see/feel soul. That line of thinking is wrong, because if you accept something before examining it's validity, you've already reached and accepted your conclusion without any chance of validating it. If you think there is a soul, first start by defining a soul, and show how and where it is a necessary component in the equation of life.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack
(pester tibs via pm if you need invite) 
![[Image: tmPmhjd.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FtmPmhjd.jpg)
