RE: Intelligent Design
January 5, 2016 at 2:03 pm
(This post was last modified: January 5, 2016 at 2:04 pm by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(January 5, 2016 at 1:59 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(January 5, 2016 at 1:02 pm)pool Wrote: Like take hydrogen for example, it's atomic number, protons and other constraints are fixed.
Exactly like the constraints on the rock made in a lab are fixed. If the constraints on the rock are altered by another intelligent being then it becomes another design, but if the constraints are altered by natural causes or random events then it is no longer a design.
So ask yourself this,
Has the constraints of something like an element like Hydrogen changed in the history of earth or even our universe? No?
Well then we know it's constraints are fixed.
If it is fixed then it is imposed. (Like assigning an integer variable in a program the value 5. It is imposed.)
If it is imposed there was an intelligent being responsible.
If there was an intelligent being responsible, then it is a design.
Do I win something already? Or am I still not making sense? :Bounce Ball:
The part I bolded is where you go off the rails. You have no where, so far as I'm aware, done other than merely assert that fixed constraints are imposed. How would you propose to even verify such a claim?
Can you provide an example where fixed constraints are not imposed? So that I can think more about your point?
I can provide an example for when fixed constraints are imposed, like take a particle accelerator for example.