RE: Intelligent Design
January 9, 2016 at 12:25 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2016 at 12:26 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
The only time why is distinct from how (and perhaps even then..not so much) is when we are referencing something that is explicitly an issue of intent. A person could insist upon the second connotation of why, the one which does address intent.....but not in a conversation in which they are attempting to demonstrate that such intent exists in the first place. They would have already assumed that which they sought to prove by the simple act of demanding that connotation.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
