RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
January 12, 2016 at 5:34 pm
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2016 at 5:35 pm by SteelCurtain.)
Suffice it to say that a person that is being considered for this will have had multiple run ins with us. Again, this is a last last last resort. The creation of the rule also has the added benefit that we can issue verbal warnings that a person is in violation of it.
Edit: Ninja Tibs.
Speaking for myself, I would always vote against using this option on a new member. Until a person has had enough time to create a good track record, it would be a 'no' vote from me.
Also, by the time we invoked this, the action would not be a surprise to anyone on the forums.
Think DespondentFishDeathMachismo.
Edit: Ninja Tibs.
Speaking for myself, I would always vote against using this option on a new member. Until a person has had enough time to create a good track record, it would be a 'no' vote from me.
Also, by the time we invoked this, the action would not be a surprise to anyone on the forums.
Think DespondentFishDeathMachismo.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---