(January 13, 2016 at 6:15 pm)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:(January 13, 2016 at 5:50 pm)AAA Wrote: What could I do to convince you? It really wouldn't matter to me if you believed it or not if I didn't feel like I'm being dismissed as a liar by nearly everyone on this thread. It's like these people are just shocked out of their mind that someone who studies biology would disagree with a particular scientific theory, not realizing that there are disputes constantly among people who study science.
It's simple: UNDERSTAND SCIENCE.
I understand science better than you guaranteed. At least biology and chemistry. You don't understand science if you think that people with disagreements among how to interpret scientific evidence are not scientific people. If I disagree with string theory, can I not be a physicist? Disagreements among people who study science is how scientific views are critiqued, revised, and improved. If everyone who disagrees with the current consensus is not a scientist, then Isaac Newton wasn't a scientist. Neither was Galileo, Lyell, Copernicus, Einstein, or even Darwin. YOU don't understand science if you think that you must agree with the scientific consensus to study science.