(February 15, 2011 at 11:56 am)Ubermensch Wrote: The Christian debater is clearly more charismatic and has the crowd in the palm of his hand. He however makes a number of errors. He confuses the definitions of atheism and agnosticism, among others.The atheist fellow is also a ridiculously weak debater.
The story of most Christian v Atheists debates. The apologist is a slick sales person, not a scientist. Their skill set is in debate and presentation. They therefore have the home court advantage in any debate.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
