Rule Change (New Staff Power)

[Drich]

[...] I push past that out come the personal insults, and in a few cases attacks on my wife's past. This is my experience in just about every topic I have ever posted here. My question was, as a theist can we do the same without reprisal? [...]

You certainly have.  When I corrected you on your claimed "uncle's" military experience, and belittled your loathsome attempt to wrap yourself in the honor accorded veterans when you wouldn't enlist yourself (because the money wasn't there!), you launched personal attacks against me included alleging that I lied about my service, both publicly and via PM. You were never warned, and certainly never banned.

You need to pull on your big boy pants and appreciate that we here don't do what Christian sites do every minute to atheists, which is ban you for who you are and nothing else.

Quit whining.  If you don't like it here --

If you remember correctly the argument was over the idea that if the 'in the rear with the gear guys' had the right to pretend or represent themselves as front line troops. (to steal the glory of those who truly put it on the line) I referenced my cousin because he (Having served on the front line) feels very strongly against the idea that the in the rear personnel should try come off as one of the guys being shot at. I also agree that a guy who fuels a plane (or holds the fire extinguisher pointed at the guy who fuels the plane) should NOT try and come off as a fighter pilot. Let alone try and "pull rank/pull the I am a war hero card" just because 'someone' (if this does not describe you then know I am not speaking to you) had some douche bag job and just so happens to wear the same uniform as real heroes wear.

That said my question was not about what could take place on this web site, but what is now allowed to take place given this new rule and how me being confrontational to stimbo specifically could result in my ban.