(January 24, 2016 at 1:15 am)Whateverist the White Wrote:(January 23, 2016 at 11:25 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Well he's not a war criminal, like Hillary Clinton, so that's good.
But is being a war criminal anything you consistently worry about? Did you take a stand against Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and their dummy Bush? Or is this just some opportune shit to throw in Hilary's direction?
Yeah, of course I did. For me I'm a mono-issue voter. Although there are lots of things I care about, I really only vote based on foreign policy and I think my bar is pretty low honestly. They have to not be a war criminal and not likely to become one. I think they should all be indicted, Hillary too. She's been complicit and even encouraged US backing of war crime regimes during her stint as secretary of state.
The hypocrites are the ones who bash on Bush and co but not Hillary who is every bit the neo-con on foreign policy as any republican. Probably a bit worse then most. That hypocrisy is amazing to me. When a Republican is in office it's always Bush did this and Bush did that when it comes to America's terrible foreign policy. When it's a Democrat, the criticism stays the same but the mention of the individuals suddenly stops and it becomes 'America does this and America does that' as though nobody at the top is suddenly making decisions. I'd vote for anybody who would change foreign policy. The other issues pale in comparison in terms of importance. Bernie Sanders fits that bill. Shame on anyone who would vote for Hillary.