(January 28, 2016 at 7:21 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(January 28, 2016 at 2:15 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: Um no. It was two skyscrapers, the Pentagon and heroes on a single airplane who cause that plane to go down in a field in Pennsylvania, rather than at the terrorists target.
We lost thousands that day, please get it right. It was so much MORE than a single building.
Still not even in the same league as an entire city being wiped off the map with a nuke, which was Capn's point.
Thank you Napo.
Yeah, duh I know what happened on 9/11. Don't know why I typed a single building. It's still not even remotely comparable to a nuclear weapon going off. That's why I'm curious as to what the social changes would be like from a much more massive event. Would the US by necessity drop a nuclear weapon on someone, even if it were an Al Queda like group who got a hold of a Nuke and somehow detonated it?