RE: Your stance on abortion
February 20, 2011 at 9:32 am
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2011 at 9:33 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(February 20, 2011 at 8:58 am)Ashendant Wrote:(February 20, 2011 at 4:27 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:(February 20, 2011 at 2:12 am)reverendjeremiah Wrote:(February 19, 2011 at 11:39 pm)Ashendant Wrote: I'm for it and i don't have any problem with killing a pile of flesh until their brain activity starts, that's the line i define between a pile of flesh and a living being
I see it a bit different. Even if the baby is ready to pop out in a week, the woman should be allowed to terminate it. I know it sounds a bit off, but as far as I am concerned it is considered the woman's body until it is out of the woman's body. In other words, the woman should have the choice 100% of the time up to and until it is born.
Any time after I would consider murder..like those mothers who dump their new born babies in the dumpsters and leave them to die overnight.
I am thinking here that the first trimester is the best time for a great many medical reasons...mostly to do with the health of the woman. Anything later will put the woman in a position of medical jeopardy. Should she THEN decide to go to term but find that she is unable or unwilling to care for the infant; then I feel it is her right to place that child for adoption ..there are so many children and so many childless couples on the planet who really need to hook up. I understand Jerry that the 'dumpster' option is abhorrent.
The first trimester is a pile of flesh so i don't agree with you, and most women don't realise they are pregnant by that time anyway
How would YOU know?? Because most MEN wouldn't...silly puny little man thing
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
