Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 21, 2025, 1:24 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
#31
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus
(February 14, 2011 at 7:41 am)ziggystardust Wrote: I do not want to have a debate on wither Jesus of Nazareth existed. My opinion along with biblical scholars (even sceptical ones such as Bart D Ehrman) that there was a historical Jesus of Nazareth.
I realize you dont want to debate it, but I cant help to throw this out. For someone like Jesus to be SOOO opinionated, and the stories of him being trained by and even suprising the scholars, there has to be SOMETHING that Jesus himself wrote. The argument is usually for writings ABOUT Jesus during his time, but that is not the point. for someone who wanted the truth to be spread so badly, why did he not write anything? Only that OTHER people wrote ABOUT him and many of those books were burnt. To me this SCREAMS that he was invented, and not a historical figure.

Havent seen anything written by Hercules either.

Besides, I find it strange that you want to put forward a naturalistic explanation for Jesus, yet dont want to discuss wether he existed or not. Existence or not, to me, would fit the criteria of "natural explanation". Wouldnt you agree?


(February 14, 2011 at 10:16 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: How about something even simpler?

Assuming Jesus existed and he was crucified, it's still not improbable that stories of his resurrection surfaced among the faithful. How many Elvis fans in the 20th century believed that he was still alive? These people lived in a primitive and superstitious time, when people thought that demons caused illnesses.

As for the "witnesses" to those who saw him fly up into the sky, I give that every bit the credibility of the Elvis sightings.

Agreed!


(February 14, 2011 at 6:57 pm)Rayaan Wrote: If the resurrection is not true, then which is more likely:

(1) the witnesses were deceived, (2) the witnesses were lying, or (3) the witnesses are made up only.

#3 - the witnesses were fictional. People also witnessed the great feats of Hercules as well? Were they made up? Yup.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Naturalistic explanation for the resurrection of Jesus - by reverendjeremiah - February 21, 2011 at 6:42 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 25573 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 19806 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 14977 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 45861 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach Randy Carson 1298 264587 July 26, 2015 at 10:05 am
Last Post: Randy Carson
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 33965 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Fallacies in an "Answered Prayer" explanation? Clueless Morgan 33 9310 April 26, 2015 at 1:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 22864 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 457731 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 8506 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)