(February 27, 2011 at 10:34 pm)corndog36 Wrote: eyes of living species do not see "reality" so that is not a valid argument.
They can see the natural world, though.
(February 27, 2011 at 10:34 pm)corndog36 Wrote: Critical thinking is not evidence, there is no observable evidence that God cannot possibly exist.
I said, "If you have no proof based on reality as only
an eye from any living species sees it, God cannot possibly exist based on this undeniably critical thinking evidence.", as a sentence. Treating 2 parts of a sentence as separate sentences distorts the meaning of the whole.
(February 27, 2011 at 10:34 pm)corndog36 Wrote: Science is not based on fact, it is based on theories derived from observable evidence, many accepted theories have later been proved incorrect by better science.
Then there is no such thing as scientific fact?
