(February 12, 2016 at 1:54 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Oh not this vapid argument AGAIN!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baraminology
Quote:Baraminology has been heavily criticized for its lack of rigorous tests and post-study rejection of data to make it better fit the desired findings. Baraminology has not produced any peer-reviewed scientific research.
In contrast, universal common descent is a well-established and tested scientific theory. However, both cladistics (the field devoted to classifying living things according to the ancestral relationships between them) and the scientific consensus on transitional fossils are rejected by baraminologists.
Some techniques employed in Baraminology have been used to demonstrate evolution, thereby calling baraminological conclusions into question.
I'm actually not familiar with "baraminology", otherwise I would have referred to it. I came to my conclusion simply based what the bible said. Also I don't think were saying the same thing based upon that last paragraph.
