It's Always Sunny - evolution versus Christianity

[Esquilax]

*emphasis mine*

This is incorrect, I stated that "a wolf and a dog can produce fertile offspring, but a horse and donkey cannot, and therefore would be of different "sorts"".

Fair point, and of course, one that Noah, master geneticist that he was, would have known. And then also comprehensively known the reproductive interactions of every other land-borne species on the planet, including the ones yet to be discovered.

Before I address your post in full, explain your version of how life came to exist and subsequently evolve.

We don't know the exact mechanism of abiogenesis yet, but that is where the evidence currently points. I'm also a little troubled that your response to the problems in your position seems to involve picking holes in mine... you are aware going into this that you'll need positive evidence for your position, and not just a reduction of those of the people who disagree with you, yes?

A horse and donkey are NOT of the same kind because they cannot produce fertile offspring.

Which, again, was well within the knowledge base of those famous bronze-age geneticists we all take our cues from, yes?