(February 13, 2016 at 5:35 pm)Alex K Wrote: Yes. So, I did my masters and phd in particle physics and quantum field theory, and the research I have done covers collider physics, extra dimensions, unified field theories, string models and some dark matter stuff. In my recent work I have specialized on the physics of the Higgs boson at the LHC. I am not exactly a specialist for general relativity and gravity, but I have dealt with it in my research and have an okish working knowledge.
Great, certainly makes me feel like a retard. But still, when Krauss says even nothing is something, why cant it be that that the state of nothing, which we all agree can lead to something, even he said in that prior video that "nothing is unstable". I take that to mean there is a twitch there in that "nothing" produced by "something".
Which makes me keep thinking the finite part is nothing, because it is unstable leads to something, which also has a shelf life, which is also finite. So I keep thinking all this is a cycle from off(nothing) to (on) something back to off again, and so on and so on.
This retard, me, can only agree that no matter what a magical puppeteer is not required to fill in the gap either way.
