What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[Brian37]

There's a lot to choose from.

"The bible is the only book that teaches the holy trinity!" is a bad one.

"If there was no god, why do we have fingerprints?  God gave us fingerprints so we could identify criminals."

"The Bible says God exists, and you can't change the bible so it's true."

"Most people in the world believe in God.  Who's more likely to be right, the majority of people, or a few atheists?"

"The ontological argument."

"The burden of proof is on the skeptics.  So you have to prove he doesn't exist."

"What is proof?  There's no proof of evolution, so I don't have to prove god.  Therefore God exists."

I don't know who is worse, the 101 laypeople who say shit like this, or the elaborate snake oil apologists who either are just educated and deluded, or flat out lying.  But either way, when I read crap like this, I can feel my IQ dropping.