(March 1, 2011 at 5:21 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Do we KNOW that the bible can't be relied on? Do you have evidence that supports your positive claim that the bible can't be relied on? Even if the bible is proven to be unreliable that doesn't mean that Jesus wasn't who he claimed to be.
The believers have no scientific evidence and the burden of proof is on them. So I don't have to disprove it. I do it because it makes me feel superior to them, which I am.
(March 1, 2011 at 5:21 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote:(March 1, 2011 at 4:59 pm)Rwandrall Wrote:(March 1, 2011 at 4:08 pm)Emporion Wrote: That came out of the bible, as we know, can't be relied on for assumptions. So how does that disprove my first sentence?
There is a difference between the Old and the New Testament. Some characters from the New Testament are real and have been identified as such.
So if my Superman comic had real characters in it then that means that the rest of the comic is to be believed?
The superman comic is a myth even if it is based on a real being.
Same reason for the OT and NT.
