(February 16, 2016 at 3:29 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(February 16, 2016 at 1:12 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Key word being "THEORY".
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
Evolution (the scientific version) has never been subjected to the scientific method, because that would require it to actually be OBSERVED. Point me to the experiment showing an ape evolving to a human.
Wow, Huggy, usually when you play the dictionary game it's to obfuscate, but this is just outright, blatant dishonesty. How did you manage to quote the dictionary, highlight certain uses of the word 'theory', and still manage to pretend that the relevant use of the word isn't there?
As far as evolution not being observed? Oh, wait . . . you're one of those who accept "micro-evoluton" but deny that "macro-evolution" takes place, right? You realize that these are terms made up by the creationist crowd for rhetorical talking points, and that these terms aren't really in use among scientists, right?
No, of course not. Or rather, you do know that because it's been explained at AF probably hundreds of times by now, but you don't care because you'd rather win an argument dishonestly (or at least derail it) than be correct about something at the expense of your faith. In other words, when it comes to you it's same-old same-old.
I know the frustration. I'm STILL waiting for him to explain how freshwater fish survived Noah's flood.
Jesus is like Pinocchio. He's the bastard son of a carpenter. And a liar. And he wishes he was real.
