It's Always Sunny - evolution versus Christianity

[LadyForCamus]

When someone has dogma first and reality second, you cannot have a sensible conversation with them. They will assume that it's reality that's at fault if the two contradict, and will say any complete shit to convince themselves of this.

Take equivocating "theory" (scientific) and "theory" (informal). I've been here long enough to see the difference explained hundreds of times. And again, in this thread. Huggy will not learn, if learning means admitting he might be wrong.

Dogma? please

I would say most of the debates I've had on this forum had nothing to do with religion, and the funny thing is, you atheist hold on to a losing side of an argument like no other, despite my side of the argument being easily proven to be true.

I think by now you know better that to ask for evidence of the above statement, so I'll leave it at that.

Also "scientific theory" as you put it has never been defined as scientific fact, must I point out "scientific theories" that were debunked?

No, scientific theories are not "debunked" in the sense that you mean. They are continuously subject to change, re-evaluation, and reconfiguration in light of new facts and evidence derived from the very same painstaking scientific method used to establish the theory in the first place. A truly rigorous, honest, and thorough scientist will challenge his hypothesis in as many ways as he can think of. You have no idea what science is, or what it does, but instead of being open to actually learning something new, you bury your head in the ass crack of your bible, plug your ears, and sing "la la la, I'm not listening!"

http://www.livescience.com/21491-what-is...heory.html