What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[God of Mr. Hanky]

I would recommend you actually read up on evolution and biology before trumpeting you ignorance in a public forum. It's painfully obvious you know jack shit about either.

I love biology, and I know how it works. It's not that I don't understand them, it is that mutation is inadequate to account for the phenomena in the cell. It's easy to just tell me I know nothing, but you didn't answer the question. Because I think you know if you say yes you will be admitting to accepting the mathematically impossible.

It isn't biology which you know anything of. Please stop insulting science with your theosophic, and uber sophistic substitutions. When you don't know jack, you have no right to weigh in on what is or isn't possible! You, Behe, and the few other quacks with false resumes and think they know better than all of the world's top scientists walk like ducks, you quack like ducks, and what you need right now is:




The following are not scientific, but they are infinitely closer to it than any monotheism: