RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 18, 2016 at 12:58 am
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2016 at 1:00 am by AAA.)
(February 18, 2016 at 12:48 am)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:I would just insult me too if I didn't have a good response. Notice how I am the one trying to discuss biological topics, while you are just mocking.(February 18, 2016 at 12:14 am)AAA Wrote: I love biology, and I know how it works. It's not that I don't understand them, it is that mutation is inadequate to account for the phenomena in the cell. It's easy to just tell me I know nothing, but you didn't answer the question. Because I think you know if you say yes you will be admitting to accepting the mathematically impossible.
It isn't biology which you know anything of. Please stop insulting science with your theosophic, and uber sophistic substitutions. When you don't know jack, you have no right to weigh in on what is or isn't possible! You, Behe, and the few other quacks walk like ducks, and you quack like ducks, and what you need now is:
The following are not scientific, but they are infinitely closer to it than any monotheism: