What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[Ravenshire]

If your going to posit a designer as an alternative to evolution, you most certainly must supply evidence. It's called the burden of proof and it's on you.

I don't care if you think it was designed. I care that you realize it didn't get there through mutation. I think that evidence for a designer comes from the specific sequence of characters that must be present in order for it to function. It really is information, which only comes from intelligence

Well then, convince me. Lay out your evidence and your methodology (so I can test your findings) and prove your case. Until your willing to accept the burdon of proof for your claims, nobody here is going to take you seriously.