What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[AAA]

It's not that I put God where we don't understand, it is that I see what we do understand, and believe it was designed based on how it operates. If I remember, you are a retired biologist? Please tell me honestly whether or not you ever wondered if it was designed when you learned about the inner workings of the cell. The way that genes are regulated is just so impressive. I read like 4 articles on histone modification a few days ago, and it is just mind blowing. Also, almost all biomolecules are capable of bearing information based on the sequence they are put in. DNA, Proteins, and Carbohydrates.

What do you mean "we?"

You must first prove the existence of god before you can claim that he did anything. But I see it's to your advantage to put the cart before the horse.

You can't prove anything accept in mathematics. That word doesn't belong in science. We can have evidence that points to a designer to life, but I suspect you'll just push that off as something we don't understand yet and say I'm just doing God of the gaps arguing.