What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[Ravenshire]

What do you mean "we?"

You must first prove the existence of god before you can claim that he did anything. But I see it's to your advantage to put the cart before the horse.

You can't prove anything accept in mathematics. That word doesn't belong in science. We can have evidence that points to a designer to life, but I suspect you'll just push that off as something we don't understand yet and say I'm just doing God of the gaps arguing.

Lay it out. Show us the evidence and the methodology. Make your case, trip-A. The burden's on you...