(February 19, 2016 at 12:39 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(February 19, 2016 at 12:36 am)AAA Wrote: I just posted it. Also you can't test it any better than you can test any other abiogenesis theory. Lets say that we mixed some chemicals in high pressure systems and got 20 amino acids linked together. Would this then be the accepted answer to abiogenesis? All we have done is demonstrated that it CAN happen. Now lets say that I go and introduce one amino acid to a solution at a time and add heat until they bonded. I form a purposeful sequence. Would intelligent design then be accepted? We have again demonstrated only that it CAN happen, we will never be able to say for sure which one DID happen. That's why the empiricism that you crave cannot be applied to the origin of life, no matter how much we both wish it could.
So, now your conflating abiogenesis with evolution. Give it up kid. They're two different things.
Everyone knows they are two different things. In the last post I was talking about abiogenesis. That is why I used the word "abiogenesis" every time.
